I'm fairly convinced the differences in AI people see between these two games are at random. The AI is pretty much always aloof at best, keep a varying amount of troops in its city for arbitrary reasons, and field massive field armies, but refuse to keep multiple stacks together (unless its the Mongols). If you're weak, the AI will break alliances and invade you. Some say Rome's was slightly better, others, Medieval's. Ignoring the extremists, people still say there is a difference. That out of the way, let's begin with the campaign portion.Ĭampaign AI: People seem to be split on this on. One isn't the clear victor, though, I believe, in the end, one is better than the other. Before I go into the differences, I want to point out that these 2 games are extremely similar, not clearly destroying the other in a certain category.
Shogun 2 was a great addition to the series, but it is still plagued with many problems simply by being on the Warscape Engine. These two games are were the Total War franchise has shined the most. Think we missed one? Give us a Modmail and suggest new Subreddits to add to the lists! Total War Center Mod List (Not every mod, but most Overhauls)Ī guide to buildings and economy in Three Kingdoms KamachoThunderbus' Spell Stat Cheat Sheet
List of Total War Tools Explaining Historyīig list of recommended reading on classical antiquity Filter ContentĬommunity Message the Mods Join the Offical Discord Join the Subreddit Discord Join our Weekly Q&A Thread Resources If that's your situation, hang around the sub for a couple of days and leave a few comments - you'll be able to post in no time! Need more details? Read our full rules here. Our automoderator also prevents spam by deleting posts from users less than four days old or who have less than three karma. Giveaways and contests must be approved beforehand by the moderation team. No politics allowedĭon't derail threads with off-topic memes or controversy.
0 kommentar(er)
